HCPList Know more before you call. About
A DIFFERENT WAY TO EXPLORE

Similar work.
More providers to explore.

Compare the published Medicare service mix of Andrew Patrick Ambrosy, M.D. with clinicians in the same registry specialty: Cardiovascular Disease.

DURHAM, NC · Exact areaEdit location

2024 published service data · 71 eligible profiles compared. Similarity describes billing patterns, not quality, outcomes, or suitability for your care.

Douglas David Schocken, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
77%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Paul Rosenberg, M.D.

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
65%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Christopher Kontos, M.D.

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
63%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Jonathan Stiber, M.D.

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
59%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Augustus Oliver Grant, M.D.

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
56%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Neil Freedman, M.D.

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
56%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Terry Ann Fortin, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
48%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Ravi Karra, M.D., M.H.S.

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
45%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Ariane Fraiche

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
34%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Benjamin J Conway, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
31%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Robin Mathews, M.D.

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
31%Service-mix similarityView profile →

John Stewart Jones, DO

Cardiovascular Disease · Durham, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
30%Service-mix similarityView profile →
How this comparison works

We use the same calendar year of CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners data for both providers. Published non-drug service counts are combined by HCPCS code across places of service. We apply log(1 + count), normalize the vectors, and compare them using cosine similarity.

Candidates share the reference provider’s current NPPES primary taxonomy and match the location you enter. We examine up to 500 candidates in NPI order, then show up to 12 with the highest positive similarity within that set. The score is not a percentile, medical recommendation, or prediction. Suppressed services are not estimated. Medicare fee-for-service data does not describe a provider’s entire practice.

Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service : 2024-12-01 · Published May 21, 2026.