HCPList Know more before you call. About
A DIFFERENT WAY TO EXPLORE

Similar work.
More providers to explore.

Compare the published Medicare service mix of Robert Edmund Walter, MD with clinicians in the same registry specialty: Internal Medicine.

TN · Exact areaEdit location

2024 published service data · 500 eligible profiles compared. This search reached its 500-profile comparison limit, using NPI order. Narrow the location for a more focused comparison. Similarity describes billing patterns, not quality, outcomes, or suitability for your care.

Girish Sinojia, M.D.

Internal Medicine · Memphis, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
60%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Christopher Douglas Bonn, D.O.

Internal Medicine · Knoxville, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
56%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Craig S Graul, DO

Internal Medicine · Bristol, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
56%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Wiley T Robinson, M.D.

Internal Medicine · Memphis, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
49%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Ellena Henderson, MD

Internal Medicine · Memphis, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
49%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Lamar E Bailey, MD

Internal Medicine · Memphis, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
42%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Randy K Mclaughlin, MD

Internal Medicine · Kingsport, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
41%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Evanna Proctor, MD

Internal Medicine · Jackson, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
40%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Sujit Pradhan Nagarkoti, M.D.

Internal Medicine · Dyersburg, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
40%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Jean Marie Mancini, M.D.

Internal Medicine · Bristol, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
38%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Todd Motley, M.D.

Internal Medicine · Memphis, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
37%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Anthony Shane Mcraven, D.O.

Internal Medicine · Knoxville, TN

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
34%Service-mix similarityView profile →
How this comparison works

We use the same calendar year of CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners data for both providers. Published non-drug service counts are combined by HCPCS code across places of service. We apply log(1 + count), normalize the vectors, and compare them using cosine similarity.

Candidates share the reference provider’s current NPPES primary taxonomy and match the location you enter. We examine up to 500 candidates in NPI order, then show up to 12 with the highest positive similarity within that set. The score is not a percentile, medical recommendation, or prediction. Suppressed services are not estimated. Medicare fee-for-service data does not describe a provider’s entire practice.

Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service : 2024-12-01 · Published May 21, 2026.