HCPList Know more before you call. About
A DIFFERENT WAY TO EXPLORE

Similar work.
More providers to explore.

Compare the published Medicare service mix of Sascha Nilu Goonewardena, M.D. with clinicians in the same registry specialty: Cardiovascular Disease.

ANN ARBOR, MI · Exact areaEdit location

2024 published service data · 57 eligible profiles compared. Similarity describes billing patterns, not quality, outcomes, or suitability for your care.

Daniel T Eitzman, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
83%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Adam Barnett Stein, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
68%Service-mix similarityView profile →

James Brian Byrd, M.D.

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
65%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Marion Angelika Hofmann Bowman, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
60%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Eric Jerome Brandt, M.D.

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
60%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Ambarish Pandey, MBBS

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
55%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Kim A Eagle, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
55%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Aman Chugh, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
52%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Alexander Turin, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
50%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Richard Westbrook Hennig, DO

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
44%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Mark Russell Benson, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
43%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Daniel Alan Perry, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Ann Arbor, MI

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only (93010)
38%Service-mix similarityView profile →
How this comparison works

We use the same calendar year of CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners data for both providers. Published non-drug service counts are combined by HCPCS code across places of service. We apply log(1 + count), normalize the vectors, and compare them using cosine similarity.

Candidates share the reference provider’s current NPPES primary taxonomy and match the location you enter. We examine up to 500 candidates in NPI order, then show up to 12 with the highest positive similarity within that set. The score is not a percentile, medical recommendation, or prediction. Suppressed services are not estimated. Medicare fee-for-service data does not describe a provider’s entire practice.

Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service : 2024-12-01 · Published May 21, 2026.