A DIFFERENT WAY TO EXPLORE

Similar work.
More providers to explore.

Compare the published Medicare service mix of Andrea Bucker Overton, AUD with clinicians in the same registry specialty: Qualified Audiologist (CMS).

CHAPEL HILL, NC · Exact areaEdit location

2024 published service data · 7 eligible profiles compared. Similarity describes billing patterns, not quality, outcomes, or suitability for your care.

Samantha Paige Scharf

Specialty details in registry · Chapel Hill, NC

Shared published services
3 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Analysis and reprogramming of inner ear implant (7 years or older) (92604)
  • Evaluation of hearing function related to surgically implanted hearing device, first hour (92626)
  • Test to assess middle ear function (92567)
78%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Noelle Roth, AU.D.

Qualified Audiologist (CMS) · Chapel Hill, NC

Shared published services
2 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Evaluation of hearing function related to surgically implanted hearing device, first hour (92626)
  • Test to assess middle ear function (92567)
64%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Nancy M Mckenna

Qualified Audiologist (CMS) · Chapel Hill, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Test to assess middle ear function (92567)
38%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Sara Brooks Weems, AU.D.

Qualified Audiologist (CMS) · Chapel Hill, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Test to assess middle ear function (92567)
38%Service-mix similarityView profile →

Jenna Holke Raymond, AU.D.

Qualified Audiologist (CMS) · Chapel Hill, NC

Shared published services
1 shared services · view billing descriptions
  • Test to assess middle ear function (92567)
38%Service-mix similarityView profile →
How this comparison works

We use the same calendar year of CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners data for both providers. Published non-drug service counts are combined by HCPCS code across places of service. We apply log(1 + count), normalize the vectors, and compare them using cosine similarity.

Candidates share the reference provider’s current NPPES primary taxonomy and match the location you enter. We examine up to 500 candidates in NPI order, then show up to 12 with the highest positive similarity within that set. The score is not a percentile, medical recommendation, or prediction. Suppressed services are not estimated. Medicare fee-for-service data does not describe a provider’s entire practice.

Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service : 2024-12-01 · Published May 21, 2026.